In December, the Trump administration announced a plan to allow the Interior Department to sell off public lands for $10 billion.
The plan also allows the BLM to sell millions of acres of land to private companies, including energy and mining companies, to take advantage of the public’s money.
But there’s another part of the plan that might be even more important than the land sales.
It would allow the Trump Administration to begin taking control of federal lands.
In the coming years, the administration will be able to take control of the land that is already owned by the federal government.
The BLM, for example, has more than 300,000 miles of public lands in the United States.
But that land is often owned by other federal agencies and the land’s management has been a bit inconsistent.
This new management plan, called the National Forest System Management Act, would give the federal agencies control over public lands.
The idea is that private companies will be the ones that take over the land and take care of it.
If you buy it, you get to keep it.
This will change everything.
The new management process would require the BLM, which has been the nation’s largest land-use management agency, to establish a process for taking over public land, known as the Management Assessment Process.
The process is meant to give private companies the right to manage the land.
The Trump Administration has already started this process with land it owns in Wyoming.
But with the new management, it will be taking over about 30 percent of the nation.
This could potentially create huge problems for the Trump administrations goal of taking over all of the country’s public lands by 2027.
It could also lead to the loss of tens of millions of dollars in government money.
This is a big deal for the future of public land management, said David Shurtleff, director of the Wilderness Society’s public land program.
“It’s going to really put a lot of pressure on the BLM and on the federal agency to manage that land in a responsible way.
And the big question is, what happens to that money?”
This is the second big change in public lands management in a month.
The first was the withdrawal of the Obama administration’s plan to sell lands for public auction in the spring.
And in November, the Obama Administration announced a $1.4 billion plan to develop a national public lands strategy, including the sale of federal land for conservation purposes.
But as this new management proposal comes out, the focus will be on the new administration.
Trump administration spokesman Mark Pitcavage told Vice News that the new plan was in the works, and the Trump team is working to get it approved by the Interior secretary.
But Shurtlefeff said the new approach could be even bigger.
The White House is moving to take over land that’s already owned and that was a part of a national park, which is what the National Park Service is supposed to do.
That’s where the land is already located, and so this new proposal would allow it to be transferred to the Department of the Interior.
The land is now owned by a company called Forest Service, which operates parks in Montana, Idaho and Wyoming.
Shurtlef said this could create a lot more problems for public lands conservation.
“The whole idea is to take it over, and that’s not what the park service does.
The government owns land, and they have the right and the ability to take care and manage the lands, and it’s up to the federal managers to take those management decisions.”
But for ShurtleFF, the biggest concern about this new administration is that it could be just another example of how the Trump campaign has tried to use public lands as political weapons.
The President has repeatedly said he would take away public lands and sell them to the highest bidder, and he’s also proposed taking the government out of the conservation process altogether.
Shreeff said that this plan could lead to more conflicts between the Trump and the Obama administrations plans.
“This new administration will take over all the lands,” Shurtleffer said.
“They’re going to be trying to take away that public land to sell it to private interests.
They’re going go into the conservation, they’re going take over those public lands to sell them.
That could create more conflicts and potentially more litigation.”
And Shurtleft said this plan would be even worse for wildlife.
“What we’re hearing from the administration is, ‘We don’t want to do it.
We want to buy it and then sell it,’ Shurtlefter said.